PowerFlex/ScaleIO storage - the MDMs validation improvements

[sureshanaparti]

Description

This PR improves the MDMs validations for PowerFlex/ScaleIO storage. Currently only the first MDM IP address is validated, this extends the validation to check all the MDMs of the PowerFlex/ScaleIO storage are present/configured or not and only configures the missing ones.

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• Build/CI
• Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 19 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 17.60%. Comparing base (d6c3977) to head (2a64ffd).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
.../hypervisor/kvm/storage/ScaleIOStorageAdaptor.java	0.00%	19 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               4.22   #12893      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     17.60%   17.60%   -0.01%     
+ Complexity    15666    15663       -3     
============================================
  Files          5917     5917              
  Lines        531527   531539      +12     
  Branches      64982    64982              
============================================
- Hits          93584    93574      -10     
- Misses       427389   427410      +21     
- Partials      10554    10555       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	3.70% <ø> (ø)
unittests	18.67% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[sureshanaparti]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@sureshanaparti a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 17251

[sureshanaparti]

@blueorangutan test

[blueorangutan]

@sureshanaparti a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests